What will you rate the 3 options that the flight from Brussels to Los Angeles?
There is no direct flight from Brussels to LA. I don’t want to fly to LA and lay over at the European airports nor the airports of New York and Chicago. My travel agency has just proposed 3 routes to me that I lay over in one airport and with one different airline company. Option 1, United Airline and lay over at Washington D.C.; option 2, Northwest and lay over at Detroit; option 3, Delta and lay over at Atlanta. Can someone kindly analyze these options by the quality of the service of the airport and the airline company? By combining these 2 factor and tell me what will you rate these 3 options and why. I appreciate your advice. Thanks in advance.
Air Travel - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Why didn't they tell you about American Air via JFK or O'hare? Or Continental via Newark? Or USAir via Philly? So... Of these, I'd scratch off Delta; via ATL takes longer, and the 767s they use on transatlantic routes are tired. United fly a 767 with personal TVs at each seatback in coach. Northwest fly a 757 (1 aisle, 3 seats on each side), no seatback TVs, but Detroit's airport is very new, modern, and easy to navigate. I'd probably go United for the comfort across the ocean. I have flown all 3 airlines transatlantic fairly recently (DL in January; NW in July; UA 3 years ago), and although I am a NW frequent flyer, I really like the seatback TVs to pass the time, and only United has them of the options you mentioned. Dulles Airport isn't so bad; ATL is inefficient in it's 5-tined "E" design.
2 :
i would go with delta
3 :
Of those options, definitely go with Northwest and definitely NOT with United (both the airline and Washington's airport are the absolute worst). Delta is okay but the Atlanta hub is prety bad. Northwest's service is great and Detroit is a good hub. Direct and nonstop flights aren't the same thing though
